Archive for the ‘Big Government’ category


November 30, 2011

Subject: Obama’s classmate speaks out

This is a rerun but good message

The penalty good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men. Plato

People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
~ George Orwell.


By Wayne Allyn Root , June 6th, 2010

Barack Hussien Obama is no fool. He is not incompetent. To the contrary, he is brilliant. He knows exactly what he’s doing. He is purposely overwhelming the U.S. Economy to create systemic failure.Economic crisis and social chaos — thereby destroying capitalism and Our country from within. Barack Hussien Obama was my college classmate ( Columbia University, class of ’83). He is a devout Muslim do not be fooled. Look at his Czars…anti-business..anti- American.As Glenn Beck correctly predicted from day one! Barack Hussien Obama is following the plan of Cloward & Piven, two professors at Columbia University ..They outlined a plan to socialize America by overwhelming the system.With government spending and entitlement demands. Add up the clues below. Taken individually they’re alarming. Taken as a whole, it is a brilliant, Machiavellian game plan to turn the United States into a socialist/Marxist state with a permanent majority, That desperately needs government for survival … and can be counted on to always vote for bigger government. Why not? They have no responsibility to pay for it. Universal Health Care . The health care bill had very little to do with health care. It had everything to do with unionizing millions of hospital and health care workers, as well as adding 15,000 to 20,000 new IRS agents (who will join government employeeunions). Obama doesn’t care that giving free health care to 30 million Americans will add trillions to the national debt. What he does care about is that it cements the dependence of those 30 million voters to Democrats and big government .Who but a socialist revolutionary would pass this reckless spending bill In the middle of a depression?

Cap & Trade. Like health care legislation having nothing to do with health care, Cap & Trade has nothing to do with global warming. It has everything to do with redistribution of income, with government in control of the economy and a criminal payoff to Obama’s biggest contributors. Those powerful and wealthy unions and contributors (like GE, which owns NBC, MSNBC and CNBC) can then be counted on to support everything Obama wants. They will kick-back hundreds of millions of dollars in contributions to Obama and the Democratic Party to keep them in power. The bonus is that all the new taxes on Americans with bigger cars,bigger homes and businesses helps Obama “spread the wealth around.”

Make Puerto Rico a state. Why? Who’s asking for a 51st state?Who’s asking for millions of new welfare recipients and governmententitlement addicts in the middle of a depression? Certainly not American taxpayers. But this has been Barack Hussien Obama’s plan all along. His goal is to add two new Democrat senators, five Democrat congressman and a million loyal Democratic voters who are dependent on big government.Legalize 12 million illegal Mexican immigrants. Just giving these 12 million potential new citizens free health care alone could overwhelm the system and bankrupt America . But it adds 12 million reliable new Democrat voters who can be countedon to support big government. Add another few trillion dollars in welfare, aid to dependent children, food stamps, free medical, education, tax credits for the poor, and eventually Social Security .

Stimulus and bailouts. Where did all that money go? It went to Democrat contributors, organizations (ACORN), and unions — including billions of dollars to save or create jobs of government employees across the country. It went to save GM and Chrysler so that their employees could keep paying uniondues. It went to AIG so that Goldman Sachs could be bailed out (after giving Obama almost $1 million in contributions). A staggering $125 billion went to teachers (thereby protecting their union dues). All those public employees (unions) will vote loyally Democrat to protect their bloated salaries and pensions that are bankrupting America . The country goes broke, future generations face a bleak future, but Obama, the Democrat Party, government, and the unions grow more powerful. The ends justify the means. Raise taxes on small business owners, high-income earners, and jobcreators. Put the entire burden on only the top 20 percent of taxpayers, redistribute the income, punish success, and reward those who did nothing to deserve it (except vote for Obama). Reagan wanted to dramatically cut taxes in order to starve the government. Barack Obama wants to dramatically raise taxes to starve his political opposition. With the acts outlined above, Barack Hussien Obama and his regime have created a vast and rapidly expanding constituency of voters dependent on big government; a vast privileged class of public employees (unions) who work for big government; and a government dedicated to destroying capitalism and installing themselves as socialist rulers by overwhelming the system. Add it up and you’ve got the perfect Marxist scheme — all devised by my Columbia University college classmate Barack Hussien Obama using the Cloward and Piven Plan ..

“Correctly attributed” says snopes!



No Amnesty for Illegal Aliens

April 9, 2010

The Government take over of Your Lake front Property

February 15, 2010

State Shoreland Development Rules Updated

Forty years after they were first adopted, state shoreland development rules have been updated to better protect lakes and rivers while allowing property owners more flexibility on their land. These minimum statewide standards are just one tool Wisconsin uses to safeguard our shorelands for the future.

The state Natural Resources Board adopted revisions to the rules Nov. 13, 2009. The final, official rules are expected to be officially published in early 2010. County governments will have two years from that time to update their shoreland development rules to be consistent with or exceed the state’s rules.

Now and after the rules are enacted locally, owners of existing homes and buildings can keep what they have. They will not have to do anything different unless they propose a major change on their property, like remodeling their home, expanding it, or paving or covering more surfaces. Then, they may have to take steps to offset the potential impacts from their project: increased water runoff and pollutants, loss of plants to filter runoff and provide wildlife habitat, and impacts on their neighbors’ and lake and river users’ scenic views.

Key Shoreland Development Rule Provisions

Some Standards Remain the Same:

  • Homes must still be set back 75 feet from the water.
  • Minimum lot size requirements remain at 20,000 square feet and 10,000 square feet.

Some Standards Changed:

  • Spending limits on repairs to existing non-conforming residences located within 75 feet of the water’s edge have been eliminated.
  • Expansion of an existing home closer than 75 feet from the water is now allowed in some cases: a property owner can build a second story or otherwise add-on vertically, if their existing house is at least 35-feet back from the water. Expansion of an existing home more than 75 feet from the water is still allowed.
  • Property owners expanding the physical footprint of a non-conforming structure will be required to offset the environmental impact of the expansion by choosing from a number of options. Examples include reducing the amount of mowing next to the water, installing rain-gardens to absorb storm runoff, or re-planting native vegetation near the shoreline. Counties will set what the specific mitigation requirements are as they update their ordinances.

Some Standards Are New:

  • A new standard caps the total amount of hard or “impervious” surfaces such as roofs, pavement and decks allowed on shoreland property. The caps apply only to properties within 300 feet of lakes or rivers, and they do not affect existing property owners unless the owners try to make major changes that would cover up more land with hard surfaces.
  • No limitations would exist for additions or new buildings where the lot’s impervious surfaces do not exceed 15 percent of the total lot size. Where the sum total of impervious surfaces is between 15 percent and 30 percent of the lot size, property owners would be required to take measures to offset the environmental impact of their proposed project.
  • Building setbacks and minimum lot sizes stay the same
    • Structures must be at least 75 feet from the ordinary high water mark.
    • Minimum lot size would remain 10,000 square feet with 65 feet of frontage for lots served by sanitary sewers and 20,000 square feet and 100 feet of frontage for lots not served by sanitary sewers.
  • Rules on legal nonconforming structures made clearer and more flexible – Legal nonconforming structures, those built before their counties adopted shoreland standards and now closer to the water than standards allow, could more easily be maintained and repaired. The proposal would:
    • Eliminate dollar limits on the maintenance and repair of legal nonconforming structures.
    • Allow some expansion of buildings at least 35 feet from the water if the owner takes offsetting steps like restoring native plants or taking measures to reduce runoff.
    • Set height restrictions for those portions of buildings within the first 75 feet from the water’s edge.
  • New standard seeks to cut runoff pollution by limiting hard surfaces – Construction or expansion of buildings, driveways or other areas which prevent water from soaking into the ground is limited to 30 percent of the lot to reduce runoff and protect water quality in lakes and streams.


Contact Information

For more information

Gregg Breese
Shoreland Team Leader
(608) 261-6430

Last Revised: Thursday December 03 2009


DNR protects the Environment, but not Humanity.

It has come to My attention that the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources has taken on the responsibility to protect the Environment over any of Humanities needs and or Concerns.

Lake front property Owners pay a Huge amount of tax, but they have the least amount of Freedom from our Governing Agencies.

Most people don’t know how much power the WDNR wields. It’s not until you want to improve your property  through the permit process do you realize that they have full control over Your lake front property.

Most people don’t know that the DNR requires You before any structure can be improved, You must Certify your property through a delineation process, Which means they will check for Hydraulic soil (Wetlands) and navigatable waterways (Drainage Ditches or standing Water) and if any of this is happening on Your Property it will  change Your setbacks and Your activities that You thought were OK on R-1 Zoning and maybe enough to Rezone your property away form R-1 into a Conservancy district.

These restrictions imposed upon Us by our regulatory agencies would be Why most people choose to improve their Property’s with out going through the Bureaucracy of the DNR and Walworth county’s regulatory agencies.

Now I understand Why people put on new Roofs , Siding, Windows additions, Driveways etc. and all kinds of stuff that requires a Permit, but the County isn’t really aware of it and doesn’t actively look for it.

Most enforcement is done by Neighbors turning on other Neighbors and that’s when the County and the DNR acts and only then, unless it’s New construction then the Governing Agencies will do everything in their Power to stop or increase costs of any Development in shoreland areas.

As a side note;  the County and The DNR will not allow any ADA ( Americans With Disabilities Act) walkways to the shoreline. Any walkway or wheelchair path MUST stop 75 feet from the Waters OHWM

More advice from Your Government;

Till Next Time,


Stop Amnesty for Illegal Aliens

June 3, 2009


For more information visit

On June 8, 2009, an ‘Amnesty for Illegal Aliens Summit’ will be held at the White House.
The meeting is behind closed doors, despite the claim of a transparent government by the Obama Administration.

Unemployment in the United States is approaching 10%, yet the Obama administration with the help of Senator Chuck Schumer (NY), is forcing ‘amnesty for illegal aliens’ upon the American people. Schumer says the t ime is now for amnesty and the American people support it! NOT TRUE!

The Obama administration has already weakened border enforcement. President Obama’s 2010 budget calls for the elimination of the State Criminal Illegal Alien Assistance Program (SCAPP). SCAPP provides $400 million to states t o offset the costs of jailing criminal illegal aliens.

American citizens will not be invited to the summit! We are not stakeholders in this discussion!!!

A bi-partisan group of lawmakers and those who have worked on immigration reform are invited. During the last push for Comprehensive Immigration Reform, a massive amnesty for illegal aliens, the radical ethnocentric organization, the National Council of La Raza (The Race) and the United States Chamber of Commerce were invited to help write the bill, behind closed doors. This unholy alliance, was promoting amnesty and open borders. American citizens were completely ignored!

The only way Americans can have a voice is to contact their Senators and Congressman in huge numbers before, and especially on June 8, by phone calls, emails and faxes. They must realize trouble is brewing for any ‘path to citizenship’ scheme!!! Otherwise why would they be hiding this amnesty fest from the view of American Citizens!!!

This is an outrage against our representative government as guaranteed under the United States Constitution!!! Our elected officials are betraying us! Can you afford to remain silent???

Contact information for all Congressman and Senators:


What have illegal aliens done to deserve any path to citizenship??? They are not the responsibility of American citizens or the United States government.
Senator Schumer knows American citizens are consistently against any ‘path to citizenship’ or ‘amnesty’ for illegal aliens. (A ‘path to citizenship’ allows illegal aliens to pay a meager fine for the precious gift of American citizenship—this is how Congress attempts to say they are not giving illegal aliens ‘amnesty’ for their crime of crossing the border illegally, taking American jobs and suppressing American wages)

Who represents the majority of the American people at the ‘amnesty summit’ that oppose any path20to citizenship for the 20-40 million illegal aliens in this country?

Where is the compassion of your Senators or Congressman for Americans out of work and struggling? They are not speaking out against the many in Congress who are pushing amnesty for illegal aliens!

Do your Senators or Congressmen represent you and your family, or foreign nationals, in this country illegally?

Why hide ‘the amnesty summit’ behind closed doors away from the scrutiny of the American people?

Have you told your Senators or Congressman that you oppose any path to citizenship for illegal aliens? It is not too late to voice your concerns.

Some More "Big" Government

May 9, 2009